Skewed Horizon

Roberts manipulated the criminal Obamacare conundrum to make the individual mandate a tax, which the libs said absolutely was not.

Elena Kagan refused to allow US Constitutional Law teaching at the
communist school of Harvard Law. She referred instead to international law.
She presented falsified evidence to the very court she now sits on.

Sonya Sotomayer is a member of a radical racist hate group La Raza (The Race)
which an LA school teacher member threatened that hispanics would “rise up”
against the “frail white people” clearly threatening violence. She has made
racist remarks in the past.

Ruth Bader Ginsberg was once the cheif council for the communist anti-Christian
hate group known as the ACLU, founded by a communist for the sole purpose
of wiping out Christianity. She worked in an effort to have the age of sexual
consent of children lowered to 12 years old.

Stephen Breyer is, like Ginsberg, a Clinton appointee. And Like all the communists
(they call themselves liberals now) has a small narrow mind and was convinced
that if you agree with the jackasses, you are thinking for yourselves. He’s so
profoundly stupid he thinks our country is a democracy.

So we know those 4 communists would support the crime of Obamacare, but what
happened to Roberts? I guess he was a sleeper. Well we need to impeach the first
four and investigate John Roberts for corruption.

Christopher G. Adamo

By: Christopher G. Adamo

The liberal media is in full damage control mode, owing to Barack Obama’s latest blunder. Assessing the nation’s ongoing economic struggles during a June 8 press conference, he flatly stated “The private sector is doing fine. Where we’re seeing weaknesses in our economy have to do with state and local governments.” It must be understood here that the real blunder was not his completely reversed portrayal of the abysmal private sector business climate in comparison to the realm of government jobs. Rather, it was the fact that he let this very telling bit of information slip, and thus revealed yet another bit of evidence marking him as a classic statist.

America immediately reacted to his comment with shock and outrage, since it not only reflects an inherent indifference to the struggles of common citizens on Main Street, but also gives insight as to his real priorities, which are to continue to amass wealth and power within government. Anyone who naively held expectations that he might attempt to truly work for the betterment of the American people has another reason to despair. Since his inauguration, Barack Obama has never sincerely endeavored to take the proper action to bring America out of its unending recession. And by his words, he reveals that he still has absolutely no intention of doing so.

In his twisted Keynesian worldview, private business and commerce is not the foundation for America’s prosperity. Rather, they are an inherently sinister outgrowth of greed and materialism, which must be constantly restrained and limited, for the general good of society, by those beneficent power brokers in high office. Concurrently, the wealth and productivity generated from the private sector inexplicably provides the lifeblood of government, by which it can empower itself to right all of the perceived wrongs of a capitalist culture.

Of course these two concepts are diametrically opposed to each other. And it is primarily for that reason that the Obama Administration has tirelessly worked for the expansion of the state, which ultimately redounds to the detriment of the American economy. Nevertheless, the established orthodoxy of the left is too ingrained in the minds of its advocates for it to ever be seriously or logically questioned. Consequently, the horribly skewed policies that brought the economy crashing down in early 2009, and have kept it in the doldrums ever since, will prevail as long as this regime remains in power. Regardless of the ongoing economic disaster and the suffering it has caused at all levels, America can expect nothing from Obama or his minions but more of the policies that contributed to it.

The evidence continues to mount on every front, revealing with stark clarity who Barack Obama really is. The only point of dispute being just how much more harm to the nation will have to occur before his intellectually blind and sycophantic minions will admit the truth and concede that such a course is not some inadvertent accident.

In another unrelated “gaffe,” he once again bowed to a foreign leader. This time, it was to Mexican President Felipe Calderon. On June 18, while attending the G20 Leaders Summit in Los Cabos Mexico, he repeated the fawning gesture for which he is now famous. Clearly, after many similar occasions, it is becoming obvious to all but the most myopic that his behavior is fully intentional. Its purpose is to tell the world that under his leadership, America is being properly cut down to size, and will no longer assert itself as an arrogant superpower. And in the case of Mexico, it is another precisely timed pander to all who assert that nation’s interests over our own, as evidenced by his subsequent and unconstitutional implementation of the “Dream Act”/amnesty agenda.

In every case, it is not Barack Obama, the narcissist in chief, who is compelled to submit, it is all of America on whose behalf he grovels. Unfortunately, this message is being readily received by the rest of the world, and those nations that regard us as a competitor, whether economically, diplomatically, or militarily, are more than willing to relate to us on such terms.

Elsewhere in the Obama Administration, Attorney General Eric Holder has finally exhausted the patience of the U.S. House of Representatives. Congressman Darryl Issa (R.-CA) is proceeding with a contempt of Congress vote against Holder. In what can only be explained as a stalling action, Holder refuses to comply with congressional requests for information regarding the flagrantly illegal “Operation Fast and Furious,” by which Mexican drug lords were supplied with assault weapons.

Holder is committing his own share of “gaffes,” some of which border on the embarrassingly ridiculous. In recent testimony, he attempted to make the case that e-mail references to “Fast and Furious” were taken out of context, and did not actually refer to “Operation Fast and Furious.” Of course he came to the hearing dripping with credibility, having already established a shameless track record of flagrant bias and unprecedented politicization of the Justice Department.

On a more patently serious note, the budding controversy of national security “leaks,” very likely originating from the White House, are no more reflective of inadvertent stumbles than any of the other undercutting actions of the Obama Administration. While inappropriate releases of information occur with unfortunate regularity in Washington, this situation has clearly caused grave damage to America’s diplomatic and intelligence efforts. Yet it was presented as an effort to boost Obama’s standing among the perennially gullible. As such, it warrants a thorough investigation, requiring full cooperation from the Obama White House. Of course, this presumes that the administration is really interested in identifying the culprit. Therefore, the net result is that investigators can only expect more delay tactics, stonewalling, and obfuscation.

Barack Obama’s track record of humiliating and dangerous actions, going all the way back to his boorish 2009 return of the Winston Churchill bust to England, and his “gift” of an i-pod containing recordings of his speeches to Queen Elizabeth (no bowing or reverence there) have clearly been intentional and purposeful. Since taking the White House, he has been unwavering in his efforts to demean and degrade this nation in the eyes of the world. When this grim truth is acknowledged, all of the other pieces fit.

Christopher G. Adamo is a resident of southeastern Wyoming. He has been involved in politics at the local and state level for many years. He has written for several prominent conservative websites, along with AMAC Advantage, the quarterly publication of the Association of Mature American Citizens. His contact information and article archives can be found at www.chrisadamo.com

Christopher G. Adamo

By: Christopher G. Adamo

At certain pivotal moments in history, societies have needed the contributions of truly great minds to sort through a flood of information and reconstruct it in a manner that can be properly digested by the general population. Shortly before the American Revolution, as the thirteen original colonies pondered their independence from Great Britain, it was Thomas Paine who solidified the debate and presented it to the public with his timeless work “Common Sense.” No less of a historical milestone was embodied in the efforts of John Jay, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton as they delivered the set of essays that was published under the title “The Federalist.” It was through their collaborative effort that the fledgling United States were made aware of the critical need to adopt the Constitution and become one nation.

Now America finds itself at a juncture that is no less significant. That same Constitution, which was established in 1789 and has been upheld through the two centuries since at an enormous cost of sweat, toil, and even blood, currently faces a mortal threat greater than a World War or any other menace from abroad. It is no exaggeration to contend that the looming dangers to our Republic, manifested in the deeds and goals of the administration of Barack Obama, exceed any peril this nation has previously faced. And if allowed to proceed unchecked, they ultimately portend the demise of the great nation we have known it to be.

Such an assessment may seem overly alarmist and extreme, yet a proper analysis of the particulars leaves no room for dispute. Admittedly, in consideration of the broad scope of the attacks against America by Obama and his minions, it takes a keen intellect, unwavering courage, and an amazing ability to research and process seemingly unrelated pieces of information in order to level so severe of an accusation, and then properly defend it. Thankfully, America has just such a champion in best-selling author David Limbaugh.

Beginning with the title of his latest book “The Great Destroyer,” and coursing through its every chapter to the thunderous conclusion, he once again displays a genius ability to unearth, sort, and logically compile mammoth quantities of facts and data. And this quality is invaluable, given that the heart of the Obama strategy is to pursue his corrupt agenda on so many fronts and at such a pace that its magnitude simply overwhelms the ability of average citizens to stay abreast of it.

Most Americans are simply unable to remain continually informed, since they are fully occupied attempting to maintain their lives in the midst of the current turmoil. Fortunately for America, Limbaugh is up to the task, and resolutely committed to doing so.

Nevertheless, to presume “The Great Destroyer” as merely an assemblage of information, however studiously ferreted out and compiled, is to seriously underestimate it. Throughout the entire work, Limbaugh structures his case in the manner at which he is so gifted, regularly bolstering the amassed evidence with findings that are at once insightful and profoundly stated. As with his previous manuscript “Crimes Against Liberty,” this book’s format effectively directs the reader from the mountains of incriminating evidence towards the inescapable reality of Obama’s end game, which is to fundamentally change America forever (though hardly in the rosy manner once perceived by his blind minions).

The introduction to “The Great Destroyer” serves as a clarion call to the nation to honestly assess the scope of danger posed by the Obama regime. From there, each chapter is appropriately titled as an individual “War” being waged against us on a particular front. Chapter One, appropriately titled “The War On America,” is followed by eleven chapters focusing specifically on such relevant topics as the economy, culture, energy, and Obama’s war on guns (which is Limbaugh’s blunt assessment of “Operation Fast and Furious”), to name just a few. Upholding the high standards of his previous writing endeavors, David Limbaugh methodically constructs one unassailable case after another against the Obama cabal.

Throughout the book, Limbaugh offers forceful conclusions to his analysis, a memorable example being his discussion of Obama Administration collusion with the vehemently anti-American (and bogusly named) United Nations Human Rights Council. Assessing an unprecedented Obama Administration “report” delivered to the council, which is hyper critical of America’s record on voting rights, Limbaugh properly characterizes it as “the gift they’ve been waiting for-a validation of their ongoing denunciation of our country.”

Elsewhere, he reminds the reader of previous outrages, (supported by an exhaustive assemblage of information) a prime example being the crushing appraisal of Obama’s misbegotten allegiances in his statement “Indeed, sometimes Obama defers more to UN institutions than to the legislative branch of his own government-that was clearly the case when he sought the UN’s approval to intervene in Libya, but not the approval of the U.S. Congress.” Considering how frequent and incessant are these breaches of national trust, and how serious are the consequences of each and every betrayal, the people across America sorely need reminders of past abominations.

Often, Limbaugh provides information that has not been nearly so readily known to the populace at large, but is no less ominous and telling as to the true philosophy and motivation of this dangerous administration. The revelation of Obama’s willingness to offer taxpayer dollars in support of the Arab-based “International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) is particularly appalling, given that the Arabs have little genuine need or concern for promoting renewable energy, but plenty of interest in sidetracking and undermining U.S. development of its own fossil fuels.

Despite the unnerving advances of Obama’s hostile actions against this nation, and the flagrant lawlessness with which he is able to continue them, after chronicling such things in almost excruciating detail David Limbaugh closes his book on an encouraging note. Hardly the blind optimist, he nevertheless recognizes and describes the road to national recovery, starting with this fall’s elections as a realistic and wholly achievable first step.

“The Great Destroyer” should be required reading for all patriotic Americans, but particularly those who aspire to public office, whether they be “Tea Party” conservatives or entrenched incumbents. In this outstanding work, they will find a comprehensive explanation of the grave damage that has been inflicted on this nation, but also interspersed in its pages are the much needed elements of a blueprint for its restoration.

Christopher G. Adamo is a resident of southeastern Wyoming. He has been involved in politics at the local and state level for many years. He has written for several prominent conservative websites, along with AMAC Advantage, the quarterly publication of the Association of Mature American Citizens. His contact information and article archives can be found at www.chrisadamo.com

Christopher G. Adamo

By: Christopher G. Adamo

Every so often, prominent liberals unwittingly divulge their true ideology in its raw ugliness. And when that happens, America must sit up and take note. It is not the flowery assurances of “social justice” or the promised bestowal of goodies from government coffers that motivates them, but the accrual of power that they expect to enjoy as a result. In reality, they have absolutely no intention of uplifting the “little guy,” but rather seek to keep him in his present condition, always awaiting a change of circumstances after the next impending election, as long as he dutifully sells his votes to the Democrats.

When Barack Obama uttered his “bitter clingers” statement back in 2008 at a private fundraiser in San Francisco, he likewise demonstrated the genuine contempt he holds towards America. In his world, those who have built the bridges and skyscrapers, grown the crops, toiled in the mines, and paved Main Street resent the influx of illegal aliens not because they are here in violation of the law and have no stake in the nation’s future, but because they look different from the rest of us. According to liberals, the divisions among Americans are strictly the byproduct of various physical characteristics. Thus the left insidiously perpetuates its caste system to its own political advantage, while remaining indifferent to its detriment of the nation as a whole.

In an interview this week on Univision, a Spanish speaking TV network, senior advisor David Axelrod brazenly made this point by disparaging the possibility of Mitt Romney picking Marco Rubio (R.-FL), the son of Cuban immigrants, as his running mate. According to Axelrod such a choice would be “an insult” to Hispanics. Romney, we must understand, has not toed the Democrat party line of catering to minorities as perennial “victims.” He likewise opposed the whole “amnesty” agenda, and the stealth attempt at implementing amnesty, known as the “Dream Act.”

Forget all of Senator Rubios’ other sterling qualities. His steadfast conservative voice is of no consequence. His stunning oratory in support of his conservatism means nothing at all. This is the world according to liberals. Racial classification trumps every other consideration. From Axelrod’s far left perspective, the only possible asset that Rubio could bring to the Romney campaign is that of his ethnicity.

Ultimately, Axelrod is exhibiting the real disdain he and his kind hold for all Americans, whether or not they can be categorized as minorities. An America united by its common culture and heritage is of little value to the liberal political machine that is first and foremost self-serving. Only if “We the People” is subdivided and Balkanized by leftist racial panderers can the liberal elite hope to ride in as the great benefactors of the helpless peasantry which, in their arrogant minds, is the reality of this country.

It is altogether unfortunate that some still cannot recognize the insidious nature of this ongoing effort to maintain a permanent American underclass, the real purpose of which is to maximize the political clout of the Democrat Party. Rather than providing any means of advancement for those truly in need, the agenda of the entrenched Democrat leaders is designed to preserve the societal maladies that have devastated America, and in particular, its minority communities. And any time a viable effort is made to improve things, it is those same liberal/Democrat patrons who will do their utmost to ensure that no improvements occur.

Out in “flyover country,” far from the callous indifference of Beltway liberals, a sincere attempt to open doors of opportunity for the disadvantaged is being pursued by Bobby Jindal, the conservative Republican Governor of Louisiana. Through Governor Jindal’s tireless efforts, a school voucher program has been established in his state, by which parents can opt to send their children to private schools, utilizing the funding that would otherwise have gone into public “education.” When fully implemented, it will liberate major portions of Louisiana’s youth population from the ideological and academic wastelands of the government school system.  So of course the liberal political machine vehemently opposes it.

“Mainstream” media reports of the program have been predictably alarmist, and hopelessly biased. In a June 1, 2012 Reuters editorial, bogusly presented as a “news” story, readers were deluged with not-so-subtle warnings of the horrors of private schools that teach “Bible based math,” and science classes that do not fixate on evolution. All of the fear mongering notwithstanding, does anyone doubt that a pupil thus educated would not only be capable of balancing a budget, but could also understand the moral imperative of doing so? More significantly, the involvement of parents in the decision to send their children to such places is of little consequence to those who believe it is the duty of the ruling class to determine where children are educated, and whose ideology is instilled in them.

Minorities are particularly likely to reap real gain from Jindal’s endeavor. It is inarguable that the nation’s worst schools are found in minority neighborhoods, and for reasons that have far more to do with the skewed priorities of the education bureaucracy. Therefore a ticket out, and the promise of a good education at a private school, could only work to the betterment of minority children who are otherwise condemned to a public school “education” that is abysmally lacking. Once again, the prospect of offering such opportunity to these children is abhorrent to liberal politicians.

Other opponents of the voucher program warn of the loss of revenues to government schools as a result of the money being diverted to competing private schools. In truth, every such effort to oppose Governor Jindal is a flagrant attempt to put the interests of the public “education” bureaucracy above the well-being of the students and, in the long run, the future of the nation.

Once the dust settles, the people of Louisiana, and indeed the entire country will be faced with only one workable option. In America’s currently struggling economy, the choice is to maximize students’ learning, thereby giving them the skills to be valued employees once they graduate, or to spend exorbitant sums of money and years of their time saturating them in identity politics and convincing them that their only future is to stand in Barack Obama’s soup lines.

Christopher G. Adamo is a resident of southeastern Wyoming. He has been involved in politics at the local and state level for many years. His contact information and article archives can be found at www.chrisadamo.com